Legal Opinion

Ex parte Louisville & Nashville Railroad

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 15, 1899PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Mobile Circuit Court'. Tried before Hon. W. S. Anderson. The facts are stated in the opinion. cited, Davis v. You, 43 Ala. 691; Bank v. (Jheney, 23 So. Rep. 733. cited, Leiois v. Laois, 25 Ala. 316; 'Lx parte Jewison, 31 Ala. 392; McVeign v. U. 5., 11 Wall. 267. '

1Opinion of the CourtDowdell, J.

— This is an application for a writ of mandamus to compel the judge of the circuit court of Mobile county to make an order, in a certain cause pending in said court, wherein H. H. Brown as administrator of James L. Brown deceased is plaintiff, and the petitioner, the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company, is defendant, requiring the plaintiff in said cause to give security for costs.

H. H. Brown, the plaintiff, took out letters of administration upon the estate of James L. Brown deceased, in Es'cambia county of this State, and as such administrator, being then a resident of this State,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lovell v. DeBardelaben Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Columbus & Western Railway Co. v. BradfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  3. Stewart v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
  4. Davis v. YouSupreme Court of Alabama · 1869

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pigg v. BrockmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Ex parte BradshawSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  3. Alabama Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  4. Kreitzer v. Puerto Rico Cars, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1975
  5. Ex Parte WinnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API