Ex Parte Winn
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
GARDNER, Justice.
This petition for mandamus is based upon the theory that a nonresident contestant of a will offered for probate in the courts of this state cannot be required to give security for the costs, and that the provision of our statute (section 7249, Code 1923) for such security in “all suits at law or in equity, commenced by or for the use of a nonresident of this state,” has no application to this character of litigation. But the case of Rainer v. McElroy, 20 Ala. 347, is conclusive against petitioner’s contention.
It is insisted, however, what was there said is dictum, but it…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Eslava v. FarleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
- Ex parte Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
- Rainer v. McElroySupreme Court of Alabama · 1852
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pigg v. BrockmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1957
- Clark v. ClarkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
- Ex Parte PettySupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
- Clark v. ClarkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
- Ex Parte BondSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947