Legal Opinion

In the Interest of Becker

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 27, 1988No. 755PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

Joseph Becker, a juvenile, was adjudicated delinquent following a finding that he had operated a motor vehicle in such a manner as to recklessly endanger another person. On appeal from the dispositional order, Becker contends (1) that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the finding of the hearing court; (2) that the hearing court erred by allowing the petition to be amended to allege that, in addition to a specifically named person, appellant had endangered generally all other drivers on the highway; and (3) that the hearing court’s dispositional order violated standards…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Commonwealth v. StanleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Commonwealth v. StanleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Commonwealth v. TrowbridgeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Matter of SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Attila Orban v. Donald T. Vaughn District Attorney for Philadelphia County the Attorney General of the State of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  3. In the Interest of D.S.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Commonwealth v. MosleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. In re Steven G.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API