Legal Opinion

In the Interest of D.S.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 21, 2012PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice TODD.

In this discretionary appeal, we consider whether 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 4914, which prohibits a person from furnishing false identification to law enforcement authorities, requires proof that those law enforcement authorities first identified themselves to the person and advised the person that he was the subject of an official investigation for a violation of law. Upon review, we answer this question in the affirmative. Accordingly, we reverse the Superior Court’s decision, which affirmed the juvenile court’s adjudication of delinquency.

The record in the instant case reveals…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Martin v. DOT, Bureau of Driver LicensingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Commonwealth v. MealsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Commonwealth v. HartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. In the Interest of SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. In Re Interest of M.M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. In the Interest of J.B., Appeal of: CommSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. In re K.M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. In the Interest of J.B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Com. of Pa. v. KitchenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. In the Interest of K.A.T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API