United States v. Wedemann & Godknecht, Inc.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1ConcurrenceMillek, Judge
I concur in the majority’s decision, but I am persuaded that the decision is needlessly premised on a fiction. Allen Forwarding Co. (Allen) clearly was the' agent for Wedemann & Godknecht (Wede-mann). However, the majority reverses the positions and makes Allen the principal. As did the Customs Court, it also recognizes an after-the-fact “ratification” of Wedemann’s protest action by Allen. •
Under section 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 USC 1514), a protest may be filed by “the importer, consignee, or agent of the person paying such charge or exaction.” Appellant contends that “agent of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Patchogue-Plymouth Mills Corporation v. DurningCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- S. Stern & Company v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- Adolco Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
- Gray v. LawrenceU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1853
- Mason v. KaneU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maryland · 1851