Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Murphy

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided August 11, 1936PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Foley, S.

The sole question presented for determination in this contested probate proceeding is whether the testamentary instrument was signed at the end as required by section 21 of the Decedent Estate Law. Every other requisite element of the formalities of execution has been proven.

The will is entirely holographic. It is written upon the note paper of the St. Regis Hotel of a form ordinarily used by women for writing correspondence, and consists of a sheet of paper folded *354in half, making four pages, with the fold to the left. Each page of the folded form is approximately five inches wide…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re the Probate of the Will of FieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of PeiserNew York Surrogate's Court · 1913
  3. In re the Estate of McConiheNew York Surrogate's Court · 1924
  4. In re Rowe's WillNew York Surrogate's Court · 1916

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Probate of the Will of LubitzNew York Surrogate's Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API