Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of McConihe

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided June 6, 1924PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Foley, S.

Separate proceedings were commenced in this estate for the probate of two testamentary scripts. The first paper is dated February 9, 1922. The second is dated July 13, 1923. In order to make a final determination as to which was the last will and testament the proceedings were consolidated and all the issues tried before the surrogate without a jury.

In respect to the making of the paper dated February 9, 1922, I find that it was duly executed in accordance with the provisions of section 21 of the Decedent Estate Law. It is claimed, however, by certain of the executors and legatees…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re the Probate of the Will of FieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of GibsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  3. In re HealeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
  4. In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of PeiserNew York Surrogate's Court · 1913
  5. In re the Estate SidenbergNew York Surrogate's Court · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of LogasaNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
  2. In re the Probate of the Will of AndrewsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1949
  3. In re the Estate of MurphyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
  4. In re the Will of StrongNew York Surrogate's Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API