Legal Opinion

Morey v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 11, 1900No. 21454PublishedCited by 5 opinions

On the Proofs. The Reporter’s statement of the case: The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWeldon, J.

This suit was brought to recover compensation as a letter carrier of the city of Chicago at an increased pay .to what has been paid the claimant.

The facts are, briefly, as follows:

On the day named in the petition, to wit, the 1st of January, 1893, the claimant was appointed from the position of senior substitute on the list of substitute letter carriers of the Chicago post-office to the position of letter carrier at the Chicago post-office; detailed to duty at the World’s Fair station, at a salary of $600 per annum, and served' at said station until the day named in his petition. The city of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Romero v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1889
  2. Belcher v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1899
  3. Grambs v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1888

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Coleman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1943
  2. Arant v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1920
  3. Hart v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1940
  4. Austill v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1923
  5. Curran v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API