Legal Opinion

Hart v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 3, 1940No. 45080PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhaley, Chief Justice

The plaintiff filed his petition on February 12, 1940, and the material allegations therein show that he was appointed February 21, 1924, as a physician in the San Francisco Regional Office of the Veterans’ Administration; that on June 6, 1933, he was placed on “administrative furlough, without pay” at which time he was serving as a physician at a salary of $3,800.00 per annum; that he had had considerable experience in military service prior to his appointment and had creditably and satisfactorily performed required duties in the Veterans’ Administration until the time of his furlough; that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Keim v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. United States Ex Rel. Arant v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. United States v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  5. Romero v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1889

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Elchibegoff v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1946
  2. John P. King v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  3. Gaines v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
  4. Umbeck v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
  5. Allison v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API