Helm v. Wismar
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
820 S.W.2d 495 (1991)
Donald S. HELM, et ux., Appellants,
v.
Jack WISMAR, et al., Respondents.
No. 73929.
Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc.
December 17, 1991.
Rehearing Denied January 28, 1992.
Daniel P. Card, II, Leigh Joy Carson, Burton W. Newman, Clayton, for appellants.
Robert J. Foley, Timothy J. Gallagher, St. Louis, for respondents.
ROBERTSON, Chief Justice.
Donald S. Helm sued Jack Wismar and Wismar's employer, Eaton-Kenway, Inc., for personal injury damages arising out of an automobile accident. His wife, Jean, joined as a plaintiff seeking recovery for loss of consortium. The trial judge…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Blackmar; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Blackmar.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Claim of Dependents of Marks v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Oates v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
- Hudson v. CarrSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
- Brunk v. Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1933
- Brickner v. Normandy Osteopathic Hospital, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.