Legal Opinion

Masters Pharmaceutical, Inc. v. Drug Enforcement Administration

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 30, 2017No. 15-1335PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PILLARD, Circuit Judge:

Breakthroughs in the development of prescription opioid painkillers have vastly increased their popularity. But that popularity has taken a toll. Opioids are heavily addictive and often lethal in high doses. The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA or agency) has therefore listed opioids such as hydrocodone and oxyco-done as controlled substances so that DEA can monitor and restrict their sale. Over the past two decades, DEA has been battling a steep increase in prescription opioid abuse — a problem that DEA views as an “epidemic.” U.S. Dep’t of Justice, Drug Enft…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Federal Land Bank of St. Paul v. Bismarck Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Alabama v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Graham v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
  5. South Carolina Public Service Authority v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Doe v. TrumpDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  2. Acuity v. Masters Pharmaceutical, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. Dana Farber Cancer Institute v. Eric HarganCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
  4. Adya LLC v. ColeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
  5. Avera Gettysburg v. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2024

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API