Legal Opinion
Buckley v. Bartenwerfer (In re Bartenwerfer)
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California
Decided January 4, 2019No. Case No. 13-30827 HLB; Adv. Proc. No. 13-03185 HLBPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
HANNAH L. BLUMENSTIEL, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge
On December 22, 2017, the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Ninth Circuit (the "BAP") issued a decision (Dkt. 179; the "BAP Decision") that, among other things, vacated and remanded in part this court's judgment of April 19, 2016 (Dkt. 70, as amended by Dkt. 125 and Dkt. 143; the "Judgment"). The Judgment declared a debt owed to Mr. Kieran Buckley by Chapter *6777 Debtors David and Kate Bartenwerfer nondischargeable under section 523(a)(2)(A)1 . The BAP Decision affirmed the Judgment as to Mr. Bartenwerfer but vacated and remanded the Judgment as to Mrs.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re: Thomas John Slyman Debtor. Turtle Rock Meadows Homeowners Association v. Thomas John SlymanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- In the Matter of Laymon Berman Walker, Bankrupt. Laymon Berman Walker v. Citizens State Bank of Maryville, MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- In re: Benjamin Moonkang HuhUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Helena Chemical Co. v. Richmond (In Re Richmond)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2010
- American Investment Bank, N.A. v. Hosking (In Re Hosking)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re: David William Bartenwerfer and Kate Marie BartenwerferUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2020