Legal Opinion

In Re Beverage Enterprises, Inc.

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 29, 1998No. 19-10892PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVID A. SCHOLL, Chief Judge.

A. INTRODUCTION

The present posture of the instant proof of claim litigation arising in the above-captioned bankruptcy case requires us to determine whether a claim under the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (“the WARN Act”) arising due to post-petition actions of the Debtor is entitled to priority status. We hold, consistent with the Union-claimant’s position on the issue, that this claim is entitled to administrative priority as an actual, necessary cost and expense of preserving the Debtor’s estate pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 507(a)(1) and…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. United Food & Commercial Workers Union Local 751 v. Brown Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Reading Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. In Re Dant & Russell, Inc., Debtors. Burlington Northern Railroad Company, Creditor-Appellant v. Dant & Russell, Inc., Debtor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  5. In Re Public Ledger, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Preston Trucking Co. v. Liquidity Solutions, Inc. (In Re Preston Trucking Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 2005
  2. Neal v. United Furniture Industries, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API