Legal Opinion

Herzog v. Sawyer

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 21, 1884PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Ai>peal from tlio Court of Common Pleas. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court. jException. — At the trial, which was had before the-Court, the plaintiff offered the three following prayers : 1. If the Court, sitting as a jury in this case, shall find that the contract dated on the 28th day of January, 1881, •and offered in evidence in this case, was made between the plaintiff and the defendants, as set forth in the pleadings and evidence, and that the plaintiff…

Read the full summary

Ai>peal from tlio Court of Common Pleas. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court. jException. — At the trial, which was had before the-Court, the plaintiff offered the three following prayers : 1. If the Court, sitting as a jury in this case, shall find that the contract dated on the 28th day of January, 1881, •and offered in evidence in this case, was made between the plaintiff and the defendants, as set forth in the pleadings and evidence, and that the plaintiff undertook to perform the services required of him thereunder, and that after faithfully so serving the defendants for a…

1Opinion of the Court

Alvey, O. J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This action is brought on a sealed instrument, dated the 28th of January, 1881. It professes to be made between the plaintiff, of the one part, and D. Herzog & Co., of the other. The partnership of D. Herzog & Co. is alleged to have been composed of Daniel Herzog and Moses C. Crane, and they are sued jointly as partners. The agreement sued on was signed by D. Herzog, in the partnership name of D. Herzog & Co., and by the plaintiff. The action was commenced on the 15th of June, 1882. The record before us does not disclose why there was a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fleming v. GilbertNew York Supreme Court · 1808
  2. Gibson v. WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  3. Russell v. AnnableMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  4. Canal Co. v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  5. Allen v. CrofootNew York Supreme Court · 1827

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Savage v. BlanchardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  2. Oldewurtel v. WiesenfeldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1903
  3. Grauel v. RoheCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
  4. Gibula v. SauseCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
  5. Birckner v. TilchCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API