Legal Opinion
Grauel v. Rohe
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided June 28, 1945No. [No. 55, January Term, 1945.]PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGrason, J.
Peter L. Rohe (appellee) and his wife own a farm in Baltimore County, as tenants by the entireties. It is situated at Baldwin, consists of one hundred and sixty acres of land, improved by a dwelling house, and outbuildings, equipped with stock, machinery, and farming implements. The appellee operated the farm. He, his wife and son lived on the place and the son, at times, assisted' in its operation. The son is married and a law student. Grauel (appellant) conducts a store and lives in Baltimore County. Young Rohe’s wife worked there, and Rohe, Jr., worked for appellant in the evenings.
Appellan…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Keystone Hardware Corp. v. TagueNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Roberts v. RoeschSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Gunby v. SluterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1876
- Kvedera v. MondravitzkyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1924
- Gibula v. SauseCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Washington Homes, Inc. v. Interstate Land Development Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Anchorage-Hynning & Co., a District of Columbia Limited Partnership v. Thomas G. MoringielloCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Maryland Supreme Corp. v. Blake Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Glen Alden Corp. v. DuvallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
- Betnar v. RoseSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.