Legal Opinion

Smith v. Washington Insurance Guaranty Ass'n

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 13, 1995No. 33568-5-IPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBecker, J.

This is an appeal from a declaratory judgment. The dispute is between the Washington Insurance Guaranty Association (WIGA) and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. The issue is whether WIGA is responsible for paying the share of a settlement allocated (through arbitration) to an insolvent insurer, or whether the remaining solvent insurer (State Farm) must bear that share of the settlement in addition to its own. Because the insurers did not undertake joint liability when they executed the settlement agreements, we conclude that WIGA is responsible for the insolvent insurer’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Washburn v. Beatt Equipment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Rice v. Dow Chemical Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. American Star Insurance v. GriceWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Harrison v. PugaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
  5. Primark, Inc. v. Burien Gardens AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. O'CONNORWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. O'ConnorWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Alamo Rent a Car, Inc. v. SchulmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  4. Smith v. Washington Insurance Guaranty Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API