Legal Opinion

Alamo Rent a Car, Inc. v. Schulman

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 3, 1995No. 34558-3-IPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBecker, J.

A multiple car collision has generated the question before us: where an injured claimant sues two of the drivers and one of their insurers becomes insolvent, will the claimant’s underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage necessarily become a primary source of compensation? We hold that so long as at least one liability insurer with an applicable policy remains solvent, the UIM coverage remains secondary.

These are the undisputed facts. Steven Schulman rented a car from Alamo Rent A Car, Inc., in Seattle early on the morning of July 10, 1990. As he drove south on Interstate 5, Schulman came up…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Greer v. Northwestern National InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Chaussee v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1991
  3. Allstate Insurance v. DejbodCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
  4. Mailloux v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  5. Washington Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. McKinstry Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Diaz v. National Car Rental Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  2. Gallagher v. SidhuCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API