Bringhurst v. Harkins
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Pennewill, C. J.,
delivering the opinion of the Court:
The only assignment of error that need be considered at length, and the only one, we think, the appellant seriously relies upon, is the one that is based upon the refusal of the court below to grant a new trial.
The other assignments raise three questions, all of which may be briefly answered.
1. That the court charged the jury it was the duty of the plaintiff below to seasonably leave the room when ordered by the defendant. The defendant contends that it was the duty of the plaintiff to leave the room immediately, and that the word…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Root v. BinghamSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
- Murray v. BuellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
- Philadelphia, Baltimore & Washington Railroad v. GattaSupreme Court of Delaware · 1913
- Colorado Springs & Interurban Railway Co. v. FogelsongSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
- Sullivan v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1903
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Storey v. CamperSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979
- Clayborne v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- State Ex Rel. Fletcher v. District CourtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
- Radio Corp. of America v. Philadelphia Storage Battery Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1939
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.