Legal Opinion

People v. Kernaghan

California Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1887No. 20209PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from- a judgment of the Superior Court of’the-city and county of San Francisco, and from an- order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of Justice McFarland..

1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.

The jury found the appellant guilty of murder in the first degree, and assigned the punishment of death. JSe now- contends for a reversal of the judgment upon the grounds that the court erroneously instructed the jury,,first, as to reasonable doubt; second, as to manslaughter; third, as to excusable homicide; and fourth, as to insanity. The difficulties in this case arise mostly out of the attempt-of the learned judge of the court below to employ.new and unusual forms of speech to state old principles, the proper expression of which has long since settled into'wéll-considered and well-chosen…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. DoyellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  2. People v. FreelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. BrighamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. People v. McNultyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  4. State v. BartmessOregon Supreme Court · 1898
  5. People v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API