Berger v. Mook
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJoseph A. G-avagae, J.
In an action for a permanent injunction, plaintiffs, a Connecticut corporation authorized to do business in New York and its majority stockholders, seek a temporary injunction to restrain the defendants, the minority stockholders, from prosecuting an action now pending in Connecticut, on the ground that the Connecticut action is vexatious and involves the same issues adjudicated in a prior action in this State. For clarity, the three actions are hereinafter referred to as the prior action, the present action and the Connecticut action. The defendants who have been served herein cross-move for…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Schuylkill Fuel Corp. v. B. & C. Nieberg Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
- In re the Accounting of RafteryNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
- Bailey v. BaileyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
- Wehrhane v. PeytonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Berger v. MookNew York Supreme Court · 1959
- Spadaro v. Newark InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1963