STATE v. THOMAS
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Concurrence
LUMPKIN, Judge:
concurring in result.
T1 I eoncur in the Court's decision to affirm the District Court's order suppressing evidence obtained as a result of the search of Appellee's cellular phone but write separately to address the following.
12 The United States Supreme Court's opinion in Réley v. California, - U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 2473, 189 L.Ed.2d 430 (2014), con trols this Court's determination of the present case. In Riley, the Supreme Court determined that an officer's warrantless search of data on a cell phone incident to arrest violated the Fourth Amendment to the United States…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Herring v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Riley v. Cal. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.