United States v. Maurice S. Osser
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ROSENN, Circuit Judge.
This appeal primarily presents an unusual issue of whether the Government’s tapping of a telephone conversation between an indicted defendant and a potential government witness in the absence of defendant’s counsel was in violation of the principles set forth in Mas-siah v. United States, 377 U.S. 201, 84 S.Ct. 1199, 12 L.Ed.2d 246 (1964). We find the Massiah principles inapplicable to the circumstances presented here and affirm.
Defendant-appellant Maurice S. Osser served as a County Commissioner (title later changed to City Election Commissioner) in…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Hamilton v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Spano v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- United States v. Lenin Juarez and Oscar JuarezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Moskow, SigmundCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Louis Moschiano and Robert Fred Bishop, in Re Stephen M. KomieCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Clement KolodziejCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Maurice S. OsserCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.