Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Anthony Gagliano & Co. v. Openfirst, LLC

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 26, 2014No. 2012AP122Published

1ConcurrenceDavid T. Prosser, J.

¶ 1. (concurring). Most motions for reconsideration are denied. The court has established strict standards for reconsideration1 and they are seldom met. A motion for this court to rehear a case is almost never granted.

¶ 2. Occasionally, however, the court responds to a motion for reconsideration by making a correction or minor adjustment to its opinion or clarifying language in the opinion. This is appropriate. Some response appears necessary when the court recognizes that the motion for reconsideration makes a legitimate point.

¶ 3. In this case, I concur in the court's decision to deny the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Wickenhauser v. LehtinenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Gister v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Wischer v. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries America, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Shirk v. Bowling, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Jackson County v. State Department of Natural ResourcesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API