Legal Opinion
Miller v. Easy Day Studios Pty. Ltd.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided September 16, 2021No. 3:20-cv-02187Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ZACHARY MILLER, an individual, Case No. 20cv02187-LAB-DEB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER: 13 v. (1) GRANTING IN PART AND 14 EASY DAY STUDIOS PTY LTD, an DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST Australian proprietary limited 15 FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE; company; REVERB 16 COMMUNICATIONS, INC., a (2) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S California corporation; and DOES 1- REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL 17 25 INCLUSIVE, NOTICE; 18 Defendants. (3) GRANTING IN PART AND 19 DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS; AND 20 21 (4) DENYING MOTION TO 22 STRIKE. 23 24…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Hunter v. Philip Morris USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.