Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided September 27, 2006No. SC 17739PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 96 Conn. App. 741 (AC 24895), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly affirm the trial court’s ruling precluding the expert testimony of John W. Kennish, an expert in premises security, on the *920ground that he had no experience, training or special knowledge relating to railroad security systems?

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17739. Decided September 27, 2006 John H. Van Lenten, in support of the petition. Robert C. E. Laney, Charles A. Deluca and Sarah F. DePanfilis,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sullivan v. Metro-North Commuter RailroadConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. Metro-North Commuter RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  2. Sullivan v. Metro-North Commuter RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API