Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 20, 1978No. Appeal, No. 1317 C.D. 1977PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge MacPhail,

This is an appeal from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming the referee’s decision after remand which held the Valley Forge Insurance Company (Valley) and/or Pittsburgh Outdoor Advertising Company (Petitioner) responsible for benefits due Claimant under the provisions of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act), Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, as amended, 77 P.S. §1 et seq.

Joseph F. Faulkner (Claimant) was accidentally injured on April 15, 1970, while in Petitioner’s employ. In that accident, Claimant fell from the top of a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Universal Cyclops Steel Corp. v. KrawczynskiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Royal Factories, Inc. v. GarciaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Halaski v. Hilton HotelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. City of Williamsport v. Commonwealth, Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. United Industrial Maintenance & Westmoreland Casualty Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API