Legal Opinion

Ellison v. Alabama Marble Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 8, 1931No. 7 Div. 41PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, C. J.

The complaint shows that the deceased child was no more than a trespasser or mere licensee, was, at most, upon the defendant’s premises by bare sufferance.

“It is a principle of law, founded on reason as well as authorities, that where a landowner suffers persons to cross his lands without any express or implied invitation on his part, and such person wanders out of the beaten paths and falls into a pit, the landowner is without fault or blame, and cannot he made liable in damages.” Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Sides, 129 Ala. 399, 29 So. 798, 799.

Nor did the fact that people, including children,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cox v. Alabama Water Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  2. Scoggins v. Atlantic & G. P. Cement Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  3. Alabama Great Southern Railway Co. v. GodfreySupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  4. Gandy v. CopelandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  5. Alabama By-Products Corporation v. CosbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Alabama Great Southern Railroad Co. v. GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
  2. Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. ZeidlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  3. Luallen v. Woodstock Iron Steel CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  4. Preston v. LaSalle Apartments, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  5. Earnest v. Regent Pool, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API