Ellison v. Alabama Marble Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, C. J.
The complaint shows that the deceased child was no more than a trespasser or mere licensee, was, at most, upon the defendant’s premises by bare sufferance.
“It is a principle of law, founded on reason as well as authorities, that where a landowner suffers persons to cross his lands without any express or implied invitation on his part, and such person wanders out of the beaten paths and falls into a pit, the landowner is without fault or blame, and cannot he made liable in damages.” Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Sides, 129 Ala. 399, 29 So. 798, 799.
Nor did the fact that people, including children,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cox v. Alabama Water Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Scoggins v. Atlantic & G. P. Cement Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- Alabama Great Southern Railway Co. v. GodfreySupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
- Gandy v. CopelandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- Alabama By-Products Corporation v. CosbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Alabama Great Southern Railroad Co. v. GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
- Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. ZeidlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- Luallen v. Woodstock Iron Steel CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- Preston v. LaSalle Apartments, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1941
- Earnest v. Regent Pool, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.