Legal Opinion

Skelly Oil Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 20, 1949No. Gen. No. 44,627PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Feinberg

delivered the opinion of the court.

This appeal is from an order and judgment dismissing the amended complaint, charging fraud, based on the bribery by defendant of a judge of the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in a patent infringement suit (Root Refining Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co., 78 F. 2d 991). The theory of the court below was that the amended complaint failed to state a cause of action.

Plaintiffs were sued in separate suits by defendant for the same alleged infringement of the patent involved in the Root case, to which…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Pico v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Ritter v. RitterIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Root Refining Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
  5. Smith v. Michigan Buggy Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1898

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Glass v. BurkettAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  2. Baker v. Northwestern National Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Newell v. City of ElginAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  4. Wetmore v. Ladies of Loretto, WheatonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1966
  5. Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. WalshAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API