Krushew v. Meitz
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.
The declaration of plaintiff claims damages for fraud and conspiracy in his alleged eviction from an 80-acre farm and separate wood lot of 11% acres in Macomb county, which he was purchasing on land contract from defendant Meitz and wife, and for fraud and conspiracy in the subsequent assignment of his rights as vendee therein to defendant August J. Burkel.
At the close of plaintiff’s testimony, motions were made by all defendants for a directed verdict for the reason that no actionable fraud was shown nor was there any proof of conspiracy. Burkel’s attor ney asked to have all testimony…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Candler v. HeighoMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Rosenberg v. CyrowskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
3Cited by10 opinions
- Mesh v. CitrinMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
- McIntyre v. LyonMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
- United States ex rel. Weinstein v. BresslerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
- Rose v. WertheimerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
- Nodak Oil Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp.District Court, D. North Dakota · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.