Legal Opinion

Michael Murdaugh v. Charles Ryan

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 26, 2013No. 10-99020PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NELSON, Senior Circuit Judge:

Petitioner Michael Joe Murdaugh appeals the denial of his federal habeas petition, which challenges his murder conviction and death sentence. Murdaugh claims that the district court erred in denying claims brought pursuant to Ring v. Arizona, 586 U.S. 584, 122 S.Ct. 2428, 153 L.Ed.2d 556 (2002), and Tennard v. Dretke, 542 U.S. 274, 124 S.Ct. 2562, 159 L.Ed.2d 384 (2004), as well as claims raising other errors by the state court and the ineffective assistance of counsel. Murdaugh also argues that the district court erred in deeming various claims…

2Cases cited64 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. James Styers v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  2. John Sansing v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  3. Abe Williams, Jr. v. Raythel FisherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  4. Garcia v. BurtonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
  5. James Styers v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API