Legal Opinion

Van Slooten v. Estate of Schneider-Janzen

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 6, 2001No. C6-00-1268PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHUMAKER, Judge

Respondent attempted to commence a personal injury action against the driver-owner of an automobile but learned that she had died. Respondent amended her pleadings to name as defendants the decedent’s estate and decedent’s husband, as personal representative. No personal representative was ever appointed. Appellants moved to dismiss the action for insufficiency of service of process. The district court ruled that decedent’s husband had actual notice of the claim and that the action, although improperly commenced, could be maintained against decedent’s estate. Because…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hunt v. Nevada State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  2. Regie De L'Assurance Automobile Du Quebec v. JensenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Stoebe v. Merastar Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  4. McBride v. BitnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  5. Wood v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Muhammed v. WelchNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Shaira Mattingly v. American Family Insurance, Kathleen PlaschCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
  3. Swancy v. TjonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API