Legal Opinion
Thomas v. Petro-Wash, Inc.
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Decided March 23, 1977No. C-74-277-WSPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
GORDON, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the Court for a determination of the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. For the reasons that follow the motion is denied.
Plaintiffs, owners of a car wash and gasoline sales facility, allege that certain arrangements entered into between them and the defendants during 1966 through 1968 violated the federal and state antitrust laws, and further, that their business was injured as a result of these alleged violations.
Specifically, the plaintiffs allege that the defendants conspired, by the use of a lease-leaseback agreement, to…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- International Salt Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Fortner Enterprises, Inc. v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. Copp Paving Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Sales, Inc. v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Drexel v. Union Prescription Centers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- In Re Corrugated Container Antitrust Litigation-John W. CulyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Holley v. Coggin Pontiac, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- Richardson v. Bank of America, N.A.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.