Legal Opinion

Bollinger v. Bollinger

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 26, 1966No. [No. 278, September Term, 1965.]PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMcWilliams, J.

The late Ring Lardner, were he writing this opinion, might have begun it by saying that although the Bollinger boys were not very congenial brothers they were not very congenial partners either. George (appellant) is the youngest. Stanley is the oldest and Francis fits somewhere in between. They are the appellees. The three brothers have spent their lives in the vicinity of Westminster, where, until 1958, they farmed, operated orchards and did grading and excavating work under informal and apparently unsatisfactory cooperative arrangements.

On 1 October 1958 they executed a formal partnership…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wikstrom v. DAVIS ET UXOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Hurst v. HurstCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  3. Mashon v. HaddockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. Gianakos, Ex'r v. MagirosCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  5. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Warren v. ChapmanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API