Schmitz v. Peterson
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Certiorari to Court of Appeal, Third Circuit. Action by Mathew Schmitz against A. A. Peterson and another. C. A. McCoy was called in warranty. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal to the Court of Appeal. Judgment was affirmed, and A. A. Peterson and others bring certiorari.
1Opinion of the Court
Statement of the Case.
NICHOLLS, J.
In re A. A. Peterson et al., applying for 'certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit.
in a petition filed in the district court, Mathew Schmitz alleged that on the 23d of October, 1901, he entered into a contract with A. A. Peterson and F. C. Van Ness whereby they promised and agreed to sell him certain property which he described — 120 acres of *135land, more or less; that before the said agreement was consummated by the aforesaid parties, during the negotiations leading up to it, and in furtherance of said contract, one J. S. Lewis, of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Ashley v. SchmalinskiSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1894
3Cited by7 opinions
- Searcy v. NovoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1939
- Harris v. CrichtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
- Cryer v. M & M Manufacturing Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
- Lawrence v. Mount Zion Baptish ChurchLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
- Colas v. DonaldsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.