Legal Opinion

State v. Ramirez

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided November 14, 1997No. 960847-CAPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILKINS, Associate Presiding Judge:

Defendant Arturo Ramirez appeals the sentencing judge’s imposition of an enhanced sentence, entered pursuant to Utah Code Ann. § 76-3-203.1 (1995), requiring him to serve a minimum mandatory term of six years in prison. The sentencing judge imposed the enhanced sentence after finding that defendant committed an offense, for which he was convicted, “in concert with two or more persons.” Id. § 76-3-203.1(1). We affirm.

BACKGROUND

This case is before us for the second time. See State v. Ramirez, 924 P.2d 366 (Utah Ct.App.1996) (Ramirez I). As before, we…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Spaziano v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. State v. DunnUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. MohiUtah Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. RobertsonUtah Supreme Court · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. LabrumCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1998
  2. Harper v. Summit CountyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1998
  3. Harper v. Summit CountyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API