Legal Opinion

Ohio State Bar Association v. Wishgard, L.L.C., Et Al.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 2015No. 2015-0921Published

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Pursuant to Gov.Bar R. VII(5b), the Board on the Unauthorized Practice of Law has recommended that we approve a consent decree proposed by relator, Ohio State Bar Association (“OSBA”), and respondents, Wishgard, L.L.C., and Edward Tygard. We accept the board’s recommendation and approve the proposed consent decree as submitted by the parties as follows:

1. OSBA is a Bar Association whose members include attorneys-at-law admitted to the practice of law in Ohio and who practice throughout the State of Ohio. OSBA, through its Unauthorized Practice of Law Committee, is authorized by Gov.Bar…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. KolodnerOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Foreclosure Solutions, L.L.C.Ohio Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Ohio State Bar Assn. v. Lienguard, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API