Ohio State Bar Assn. v. Lienguard, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
{¶ 1} Pursuant to Gov.Bar R. VII(5b), the Board on the Unauthorized Practice of Law has recommended our approval of a consent decree proposed by relator, Ohio State Bar Association, and respondents, Lienguard, Inc., and Allan R. Popper. We accept the board’s recommendation and approve the proposed consent decree submitted by the parties, as follows:
{¶ 2} “1. The unauthorized practice of law is the rendering of legal services for another by any person not admitted to practice law in Ohio. Gov.Bar R. VII(2)(A).
{¶ 3} “2. With limited exception, a corporation may not give legal advice to another,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Judd v. City Trust & Savings BankOhio Supreme Court · 1937
- Lorain County Bar Ass'n v. KocakOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- Disciplinary Counsel v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Foreclosure Solutions, L.L.C.Ohio Supreme Court · 2009
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ohio State Bar Association v. Wishgard, L.L.C., Et Al.Ohio Supreme Court · 2015