Stapleton v. Martin

1. I concur in the ruling in headnote 1, because the act of 1925 purports to amend Park’s Code but does not mention or undertake to amend the oifieial Code or any act of the General Assembly. I dó not wish to be committed to the view that an act to amend a private publication, even one of so concededly excellent a character as that mentioned, will amount to an amendment of the law of Georgia. It seems to me that a number of similar publications *349might be mentioned, an effort to amend any of which would indicate conclusive reasons why such an act would amount to - a nullity.

2, 3. I concur in…