Legal Opinion

Dunlap v. Sunset Lumber Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 3, 1914No. Civ. No. 1301PublishedCited by 1 opinion

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County. T. W. Harris, Judge. The facts are .stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The plaintiff brought this action for the purpose of securing a decree canceling a certain promissory note and a certain deed of trust, said note having been executed in favor of and delivered to the defendant corporation by her and her husband, and said deed of trust executed by her to secure the payment of said note.

The sum and substance of the allegations of the complaint is that the note in suit was and is not, so far as the plaintiff is concerned, supported by a consideration.

The defendants answered the complaint, specifically denying each and all of its material averments, and also…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. MilnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Adams v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Thom v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Keating v. MorrisseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  5. Lagomarsino v. GianniniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bank of America v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API