Legal Opinion
Planning v. City of Pittsburgh Planning Commission
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided January 9, 2015PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge McCULLOUGH.
Oakland Planning and Development Corporation (Appellant), an owner of rental property on Robinson Street, appeals from the February 25, 2014 order of the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas (trial court), affirming the decision of the City of Pittsburgh (City) Planning Commission (Planning Commission) that ap*875proved Oakland Portal Partners, L.P.’s (Oakland Portal) project development plan application. We affirm.
Facts and Procedural History
Oakland Portal owns an approximately 3.68-acre parcel of land (Property) located in the Oakland Public Realm Zoning District.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Archbishop O'Hara's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Bray v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Lord AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Tuckfelt v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Zoning Hearing Board of Sadsbury Township v. Board of Supervisors of Sadsbury TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- C. Gates & S. Pascal v. City of Pittsburgh Planning CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- Lumania Properties, L.P. v. Planning Comm. of the City of PittsburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
- Troiani Group & Troy Dev. Assocs., L.P. v. City of Pittsburgh Planning Comm.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2022