Legal Opinion

Rush v. Concrete Materials & Construction Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 8, 1951No. 38,443PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Thiele, J.:

Plaintiffs instituted this action to enjoin the maintenance of an alleged nuisance. The defendants’ demurrer to the petition was overruled and they have appealed.

The petition contained twenty-five numbered paragraphs and attached to it was a copy of a long and detailed lease. No attempt will be made to abstract all of the allegations of the petition, our statement thereof being deemed sufficient to discuss appellants’ specification of errors.

The petition alleged the status of the plaintiffs and of the defendants; that plaintiffs owned…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. North v. PetersSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Duensing v. LeamanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  3. Elliott v. ClineSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  4. McKeever v. BukerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  5. Reitzer v. Medina Valley Irrigation Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1913

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jacobson v. ParrillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  2. Russell v. American Rock Crusher Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  3. Sade v. HemstromSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
  4. First National Bank of Topeka v. United Telephone Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  5. Pfannenstiel v. Central Kansas Power Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API