McKeever v. Buker
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Jefferson district court; Marshall GepHART,,judge. STATEMENT. W. S. Buker (under the name of the Farmers’ Mutual Telephone Company) and a number of officers and members of the Blue Mound Mutual Telephone Company brought this suit for an injunction against George McKeever.
Read the full summary
Error from Jefferson district court; Marshall GepHART,,judge. STATEMENT. W. S. Buker (under the name of the Farmers’ Mutual Telephone Company) and a number of officers and members of the Blue Mound Mutual Telephone Company brought this suit for an injunction against George McKeever. Schuyler Spurlock was also made a defendant, for the reason only; that he was a member of the Blue Mound company and refused t,o join as a plaintiff, and afterward he filed a disclaimer in the suit. It appears that Buker operates a telephone exchange in the city of Valley Falls. In this exchange he maintains a…
1Opinion of the Court
*203'The opinion of the court was delivered by
Smith, J.:
The petition, after reciting substantially the facts stated, avers that the plaintiffs had objected 'to the defendant’s maintaining the switch and notified him to remove the same; that upon his refusal so to ■do they had disconnected his line from the line of the Blue Mound company, and that he had thereafter reattached the same. Their ground for injunction is embraced substantially in the following paragraph:
“Plaintiffs further aver that they have no adequate remedy at law, and that, they suffer great annoyance and inconvenience by reason…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Walker v. City of HutchinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Hubbell v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1930
- Milliken v. Fidelity and Casualty Company of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
- Rush v. Concrete Materials & Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1951
- Milliken v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.