Legal Opinion

Cummings & Associates, Inc. v. City of Oklahoma City Ex Rel. Oklahoma City Police Department

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 30, 1993No. 74057PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HODGES, Chief Justice.

Cummings and Associates and Audrey Cummings (lawyers) sought a writ of mandamus to compel the Oklahoma City Police Department (department) to make traffic collision reports available for public inspection. The lawyers desired access to these records without providing the names of parties or other information regarding a particular accident. The department refused to provide access to the reports unless lawyers could first give the names of the parties involved or the date and location of the accident. The trial court held that the Oklahoma Open Records Act (Act),…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shapero v. Kentucky Bar Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. State Highway Commission v. Green-Boots Const. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma State Board of Medical Licensure & Supervision v. MigliaccioCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1996
  2. Transportation Information Services, Inc. v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  3. Opinion No. (2009), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API