Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Munday

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 10, 2013PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

BENDER, J.

Appellant, Herbert Munday, appeals from the judgment of sentence of an aggregate term of 5-10 years’ incarceration imposed following his conviction for drug and firearm offenses. In light of the Supreme Court of the United States’ recent holding in Alleyne v. United States, - U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 2151, 186 L.Ed.2d 314 (2013), Appellant argues the imposition of a mandatory minimum term of 5 years’ incarceration pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S. § 9712.1 constitutes an illegal sentence because the facts necessary for imposition of the mandatory minimum were not established beyond a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SamuelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Commonwealth v. CapaldiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. Com. v. Melendez-Negron, J., Jr.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. Commonwealth, Aplt v. Dimatteo, P.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API