Legal Opinion

Blackwell v. Dannenberg Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 26, 1924No. 15247PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

1. Where an action is brought to enforce payment of a debt for which promissory notes have been pledged as collateral security, it is incumbent upon the plaintiff “ either to produce and restore the collateral . . or to satisfactorily account for its nonproduction.” Where to a suit upon a note the defendant pleads that other notes were pledged as collateral security to the one sued on, and that the plaintiff has converted the collateral, the value of which the defendant prays to recoup, and where in support of this plea the defendant testifies to the pledge, and that before suit he offered to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Whiddon v. HallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
  2. Redd & Co. v. Lathem & SonsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  3. Turner v. Commercial Savings BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Blount v. DunlapCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  2. Continental Trust Co. v. Tennille Banking Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  3. Bank of Emanuel v. HallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  4. Greenblatt v. McCurdyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  5. Cocke v. HoylSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API