Legal Opinion
Glass v. Kemper Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided April 1, 1996No. 95 C 3178PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ALESIA, District Judge.
Before the court are the defendants Kemper Corporation’s (“Kemper”), The Prime Group, Inc.’s (“Prime”), Prime International, Inc.’s (“PII”), Stephen Timbers’ (“Timbers”), and John Neal’s (“Neal”) (collectively, “defendants”) motions to dismiss Count VI of plaintiff Gregory Glass’s (“Glass”) first amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). For the reasons that follow, the court grants defendants’ motions to dismiss Count VI of Glass’s first amended complaint.
I. BACKGROUND 1
Some time in the early 19.90s, Kemper,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Jorge Gomez v. Illinois State Board of Education and Ted Sanders, in His Official Capacity as Illinois State Superintendent of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Niven v. SiqueiraIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
- Henry v. St. John's HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
- Wimmer v. KoenigsederIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Gregory Glass v. Kemper CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Liaquat Khan v. Van Remmen, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2001
- Vengurlekar v. Silverline Technologies, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- DeGeer v. GillisDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
- In Re Lorazepam & Clorazepate Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.