Legal Opinion

Gantt v. Bishop

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided December 2, 2022No. 8:19-cv-03586Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND ANTONIO WARREN GANTT, Petitioner, v. Civil Action No.: PWG-19-3586 FRANK BISHOP, Respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION In response to this Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Respondents assert that the Petition is subject to dismissal because it raises procedurally defaulted claims which are otherwise without merit. ECF No. 7 (Answer). Petitioner Antonio Warren Gantt has filed a reply. ECF No. 9 (Reply). No hearing is necessary to determine matters pending before the Court. See Rule 8(a), Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API