Legal Opinion

Meeks v. Nalley (In re Nalley)

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Georgia

Decided March 26, 2014No. Bankruptcy No. 05-11160; Adversary No. 13-01028PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SUSAN D. BARRETT, Chief Judge.

Before the Court are affirmative defenses asserted in the answer filed by Earl C. Nalley, Jr. (“Clay Nalley”) and Cynthia Nalley (jointly, “the Nalleys” or “Debtors”) seeking to dismiss this adversary proceeding filed by Wilton Clinton Meeks, III (“Meeks”), Paul and Jesse Burke (jointly, “the Burkes”), and A. Stephenson Wallace, the Chapter 7 Trustee (“the Chapter 7 Trustee”) (jointly, “Plaintiffs”). The adversary complaint seeks declaratory relief that the 11 U.S.C. § 362 stay has been violated, injunctive relief, and trans*414fer avoidance pursuant…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Law v. SiegelSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  2. Marshall v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Segal v. RochelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. In the Matter of Daniel J. YONIKUS and Carolyn S. Yonikus, Debtors. Appeal of Daniel J. YONIKUSCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  5. Tennessee Student Assistance Corporation v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pettie v. Ringo (In re White)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2016
  2. In re KileyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 2018
  3. Randall E KimballUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API