Legal Opinion

Township of Manalapan v. Genovese

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided January 12, 1983PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

KING, J.A.D.

This is an appeal from a denial of severance damages in a condemnation proceeding. By summary judgment, Judge She-bell ruled against appellants. We conclude that he was correct. There were no material issues of fact; we decline appellants’ invitation to innovate the law of condemnation. Appellants fail to persuade us that they conform to the requisites of unity of use and ownership required by Supreme Court precedent. Newark Housing Auth. v. Norfolk Realty Co., 71 N.J. 314, 325 (1976).

These facts are pertinent. Appellant ED & Y Realty Co.,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Village of Ridgewood v. Sreel Investment Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  2. Housing Authority of Newark v. Norfolk Realty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
  3. NJ Highway Authority v. J. & F. HOLDING CO.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  4. State v. Bakers Basin Realty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
  5. State v. Bakers Basin Realty Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Union County Imp. Auth. v. ArtakiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
  2. State v. Whitehead Bros. Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
  3. NORTH HUDSON SEWERAGE AUTHORITY, ETC. VS. HARTZ MOUNTAIN INDUSTRIES (L-1722-14, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (CONSOLIDATED)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API