Legal Opinion

State v. Bodenschatz

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 13, 1983No. 21-357b; CA A25061PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

Defendant appeals his convictions for robbery in the first degree and kidnapping in the first degree. The issues are whether the evidence showed that the kidnapping was done with a purpose that would bring it within the provisions of ORS 163.235 and whether defendant was entitled to discovery of the report of a polygraph examiner who had examined the victim. We affirm.

Defendant and his brother Bruce were hitchhiking. Their eventual victim Abrahams offered them a ride. Defendant sat in the back seat, and Bruce sat in the front. The men told Abrahams that they were going to the coast. He agreed…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. State v. KrummacherOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  4. State v. HarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. KoenneckeOregon Supreme Court · 1976

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Morris v. Achen Const. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  3. State v. BannisterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  5. State v. SierraCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API